The photograph below was taken in Vilnius, Lithuania with a pretty mundane digital compact camera. At the time, theft and mugging was rampant so a camera had to be low value in order that it didn't hurt too much if it got stolen and easily concealable as well as quick into action. This brings me neatly to my first point which is practicality.
The
ideal for wandering around in safe places is a camera that will allow
you to take the images you want without problems. There's a tendency
toward wanting something to cater for every eventuality. There is a
penalty for that and that's a cost and a weight penalty. It's no fun
wandering around a hot country with a 30lb weight over your shoulder.
That's the kind of thing the army does in warfare. It's not what you
want to do in peacetime. Of course it's possible to take all the camera
gear you can dream of with you as luggage and just to leave it in an
hotel room. The problem is that 90% of it will just get left in the
hotel room. What you need to do is to carry what you will actually use
without compromising on optical or image quality.
Zoom
compacts are usually the best choice for most tourists as a handy
all-in one photo solution. Some suggest buying bulk storage devices and
uploading what's on your memory cards to the bulk storage unit on a
nightly basis. I regard that as very bad advice. Much better to spend
the money instead on more memory cards. Unless you plan to shoot video
with your camera then there should be no problem with this as a storage
option. I would not personally trust the wifi-memory cards too much. I
had one and it kinda-sorta worked (mine was by Eye-Fi) but it didn't
work well with video. The cost of one of the bulk storage devices is
quite high compared to the cost of several memory cards. The biggest
downside of the bulk storage devices is that if it gets broken or
damaged or lost, that's all your photos gone and since most use a
magnetic disk which is inherently fragile, it's almost pure suicide.
For
those wishing to travel to take photos with a digital SLR, I recommend
just taking one lens. If I were to take a Canon camera then the Canon
17-85IS seems a pretty decent choice. It has a good wide end and a
fairly good telephoto end. Add a polarizing filter and a lens hood and
you're away. Personally, I wouldn't bother carrying a flash. I'd just
use the built-in flash for that extra illumination. I wouldn't take a
tripod either.
The ideal camera for travel has
to be the Olympus digital SLR. It's a lot smaller, lighter and more
portable than most digital SLRs. Even the new thing of Interchangeable
Lens Compacts could be helpful. In a way these are very much the
replacement for the Leica M series of cameras so beloved of travel
photographers for their compact size. No modern camera is quite as
robust as a Leica M but on the other hand, they're a lot lighter. In the
travel game, weight and size count for a lot. The other thing with the
ILCs is they look much more like a compact and much less like a
professional camera. That counts for a lot.
Taking
photos. Usually when traveling, it's best to avoid sensitive subjects.
The police, armed forces, government buildings etc are all considered
off limits for photography in most countries around the world. Taking a
photo in such a place could well land you in jail for a few years or
accused of espionage or worse. In the Middle East, it's usually frowned
upon to photograph people or more particularly women. In some countries,
people photography is banned outright on religious grounds. Know the
country before you go and ask before there's a doubt about what you can
photograph.
Security - as I mentioned about the
photograph of the church in Vilnius, you have to have your wits about
you. A small, easily concealable camera or not carrying one at all could
be your best option in some areas, particularly where there are plenty
human predators.
Shots and visas. Just make
sure you have all the right shots and visas - it makes life so much
better when you're not fined or turned away at the border for not having
a visa or come back suffering from some nasty disease.
GPS
loggers for your photos? I wouldn't bother. I'd just carry a notepad
and write down where you were when you took the photo. GPS isn't very
accurate. at the best of times. I've seen my car GPS give me some very
strange locations. There have been reports of GPSs being up to 500 miles
out for no clearly discernible reason. In fact, my current phone has
GPS on it and quite often I look at the track of where I am supposed to
have been and wonder how I managed to do the journeys suggested. One of
the more amazing things was a trip to the store. It's about 2 miles from
my house and my phone GPS reckoned I had driven over 1,200 miles to get
there. Get a notepad - much cheaper, more reliable, lighter, more
durable, more practical and much less attractive to villains.
Just go and have fun. Post your best photos somewhere!
No comments:
Post a Comment